ADAAS
ADAASADAASMarketplace
C-004Control

Product Review & Assessment

A point-in-time audit of your product from every angle — technical and business — ending in a report you can actually act on.

The problem

Inheriting or scaling a product without a trustworthy, independent picture of its architecture, code, security and compliance — so every decision is a guess.

How we solve it

Product Review & Assessment is the control engagement we recommend to new clients first. We evaluate your product systematically — architecture, code base, documentation, security and process — and look at it from both the technical and the business side. We define the objectives, conduct a technical audit, compare the current implementation against your business goals and industry standards, and deliver a detailed report with metrics that show exactly where your product stands. From those results you can move confidently into ongoing Quality Control (C-002) or supervision.

What you get
  • An independent, multi-angle read on your product — technical and business.
  • A detailed report with metrics, not vague impressions.
  • Compliance with industry quality standards, measured rather than assumed.
  • A clear starting point for supervision or ongoing quality control.

A bounded, phased engagement. Each bar below is proportional to its estimated duration on a shared calendar.

1Identify objectives~2 days

Define the goals of the audit and analyse the requirements and quality attributes.

2Conduct the product audit~1 week

Assess architecture, security, data and internal development processes.

3Prepare and present results~3 days

Compare implementation to business goals and deliver the detailed report.

012
Bars are proportional to estimated calendar weeks · total ~2 weeks

Concrete artefacts you keep — delivered in editable, open formats your team owns.

  • Assessment & Review Report

    A detailed report describing every aspect of the system and its compliance with quality standards.

    Report
  • Metrics Set

    Metrics illustrating conformance to the initial requirements and industry standards.

    Scored metrics
  • Improvement List

    A prioritised list of improvements and suggestions.

    Structured list

The edges of this engagement, and what we’ll need from you to run it.

What's not included
  • Fixing the issues we find — assessment stays independent of implementation.
  • Ongoing monitoring (that's Product Development Quality Control, C-002).
  • Formal certification or regulatory submission.
  • Team performance evaluation (see C-003).
What we'll need from you
  • Access to the codebase, architecture and documentation.
  • The business goals and requirements to assess against.
  • Technical stakeholders available for workshops and Q&A.
  • Any industry standards you need to be measured against.

Fixed-scope and outcome-priced — one agreed figure for a defined set of deliverables, with no hourly billing.

InvestmentFrom $4,400

About 2 weeks; scales with product size and depth.

How we price it
  • Fixed scope, agreed before we start — no open-ended hourly billing.
  • One figure covers the full set of deliverables listed alongside.
  • The number only moves with system complexity, and only by agreement.
Included in this price
  • Assessment & Review Report
  • Metrics Set
  • Improvement List

Answers to the questions we hear most about this engagement.

What does the assessment cover?

Architecture, code base, documentation, security, data and internal processes — viewed from both the technical and the business side.

What do we get at the end?

A detailed report with a set of metrics showing your product's compliance with its initial requirements and industry standards, plus a prioritised list of improvements.

Is this a one-off or ongoing?

It's a point-in-time audit. For continuous oversight afterwards, move to Product Development Quality Control (C-002) or Product Development Supervision.

Why start here?

It's the baseline. The review tells you where the product truly stands, so every engagement after it is grounded in evidence rather than assumption.